SecureDevelopmentPhilosophy

In the beginning the waterfall was a fixed, sequential software development model based on an earlier legacy of production design, test and development. It took decades for waterfall development approaches to give way to the need for agility. This brought about the transition to DevOps, combining software development and operations into one ongoing process.

Why it doesn't work?

Even agility and DevOps hit a snag.

But even agility and DevOps soon hit a snag. In the past, security was something of an afterthought in software development, factored into the testing phase. Security tended to be bolted on as an afterthought, increasing development costs and worse, introducing vulnerabilities. Today, this area causes a lot of confusion in teams from the early stages of the development process, and not everyone knows how to approach it.

  1. 01Waterfallfixed, sequential, security tested at the end
  2. 02Agilefaster delivery, security still an afterthought
  3. 03DevOpsdevelopment and operations as one, security bolted on
  4. 04DevSecOpssecurity shifted left, into every stage

New philosophy of DevSecOps

Security shifted left, into the whole cycle.

DevSecOps puts security at the forefront of the DevOps process. A fundamental principle of DevSecOps is that security is shifted left into the process. It becomes an integral part of the development and operation cycle.

When it is, software can be built with greater agility, delivered faster, and most importantly, safer and more secure.

  1. Plan
  2. Code
  3. Build
  4. Test
  5. Release
  6. Operate

The problem today

Managers and developers both struggle.

Developers and their managers struggle with the presence of vulnerabilities during software delivery. Maintaining code security under time pressure and without the right skills is difficult.

Managers' problems

  • Lack of communication between stakeholders and management.
  • New hires lack secure programming skills.
  • Insufficient training time and resources.
  • Missing security objectives coverage in the initiation phase and scoping.
  • Exclusion from the Definition of Done.

Developers' problems

  • How to find and fix security risks early in the software development process.
  • Whether they can save time and speed up software release.
  • How to stay vigilant when debugging and testing their own or co-workers' code.
  • Non-functional requirements assigned the lowest priority.
  • Gaps in technology and domain knowledge.

Testing alone

Why might security only in the testing phase not be enough?

  1. 1

    Scanners, tools and pentests are reactive — they often find flaws only once the app is in production.

  2. 2

    Fixing after deployment is too late. Security has to start on the left: a secure culture across design, development and operations.

  3. 3

    Security testing itself is still maturing — it can't catch everything.

That's why we are driving a new approach!

Imagine a solution that allows you to run a team of developers with security principles all the way to deployment — and become more productive.

Working according to the philosophy of secure development provides a number of benefits for developers, their managers, and ultimately the entire project.

The right approach to secure development has a positive impact on all stages of the delivery process, but the greatest benefits are achieved during debugging and testing, coding and application design.

Secure development helps build trust between managers and developers who share responsibility for code quality. This is achieved through clear communication, which is a key part of an effective safety culture.

Main benefits for managers

  • Granting a default key factor to the shareholders by including security requirements in the Definition of Done.
  • Well-advised toolset selection that provides greater coding security.
  • Saves time and speeds up software releases.
  • Ability to motivate developers by improving their secure coding skills.
  • Better risk management: potential security risks identified early in the process.

Main benefits for developers

  • Embracing security as a culture.
  • Greater confidence in coding techniques.
  • Caution and focus when debugging and testing their own code.
  • Greater security awareness whilst creating an architecture.
  • Avoiding vulnerable toolchains, modules and libraries.
  • Reduced stress by developing software with security in mind from the beginning.

DevOps or DevSecOps?

Reactive measures, or proactive ones.

Unlike DevOps, which is mostly reactive, the DevSecOps role also comes with proactive tasks.

Reactive approachesDevOps

  • Measuring the seriousness of defects
  • The elapsed time since the discovery of defects
  • Scanner metrics
  • Defect counts
  • Time to resolve defects

Proactive approachesDevSecOps

  • Measuring a developer's awareness of the OWASP Top 10 security risks
  • Training developers for competency around application security
  • The use of pre-approved code
  • Security automation on each SDLC stage
  • Ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements

What can we do for you?

Four ways we help you build secure software.

Whatever you are looking for, our team can help you achieve your goals and meet your expectations.

  1. 1

    Prepare the organization

    Conduct a thorough security assessment and create a customized plan to align with your business goals.

  2. 2

    Protect the software

    Implement advanced security measures at every stage of the development process.

  3. 3

    Produce well-secured software

    Adhere to industry-standard security practices and conduct thorough testing and quality assurance checks.

  4. 4

    Respond to vulnerabilities

    Quickly identify and address any vulnerabilities, develop a remediation plan and work effectively to address the issue.

Book a free expert session

Demystify our DevSecOps approach

11 phases, from requirements to threat analytics.

Gain perspective on how DevSecOps overlays the classic DevOps model — feel the added value and craft it upon the project needs.

  1. 1Security goals integrated into requirements

    Security risks become concrete requirements in the project plan — e.g. via the CIA triad (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) — and are refined and tested throughout development.

    • Security trades off against usability, cost and time-to-market: encryption at rest adds hardware cost; strict passwords hurt ease of use.
    • Developers, designers, security experts and business negotiate the balance — so security stays a priority to the end.
  2. 2Risk assessment and profiles

    Risks to your assets are identified, rated (qualitatively or quantitatively), prioritized and profiled, then managed through a mitigation plan with ongoing monitoring.

    • People are a major risk factor: strong safeguards fail if staff are untrained or careless with passwords.
    • So assessments weigh human factors alongside technical ones — and training is part of mitigation.
  3. 3Secure architecture risk analysis

    SARA evaluates the system's architecture — threats, vulnerabilities, priorities, mitigations — early, while fixes are cheap.

    • Attack trees break an attack into steps to expose weak points and countermeasures.
    • Automated tools speed it up and cut human error, but always alongside expert review.
    • Ongoing: re-run whenever threats or the architecture change.
  4. 4Secure third-party / open-source components selected

    Every third-party and open-source component is evaluated for security risk before use, with a plan to mitigate what's found.

    • Software composition analysis (SCA) tools flag known vulnerabilities and licensing issues automatically.
    • Open source cuts cost and adds flexibility, but is risky unless vetted.
    • Ongoing: re-evaluate as components and threats change, to stay secure and compliant.
  5. 5Secure coding adherence

    Secure coding standards are set, taught to developers, enforced in code review and monitored over time.

    • Static analysis catches vulnerabilities and standard violations early — some tools even suggest fixes.
    • Regular training matters as much as tools: developers are the ones who apply the standards.

    Frameworks we use

    OWASP ASVS
    Security requirements for web apps, by assurance level.
    CWE
    Catalogue of common software weaknesses and mitigations.
    NIST SP 800-53
    US federal security controls and guidelines.
    BSIMM
    Maturity model for software security practices.
    PCI DSS
    Security standard for card payment transactions.
  6. 6SAST / IAST tools integrated to proactively identify flaws

    SAST scans source code; IAST tests the running app in real time. Developers fix what they report — before release.

    • Custom rules per language, framework or industry standard raise accuracy and cut false positives.
    • ML/AI increasingly improves detection.
    • Tools have limits — we pair them with manual code review and other testing.
  7. 7Dynamic testing, attacks & penetration

    The running application is attacked on purpose — penetration tests, fuzzing, vulnerability scans — and the weaknesses found are fixed.

    • Inputs are fed to the live software and outputs checked against expected results.
    • Done regularly and early, it catches issues before customers do — cutting the risk of costly failures.
  8. 8Secure configuration standards applied

    Infrastructure security controls are chosen, configured, tested and kept up to date against unauthorized access, theft and damage.

    • Hardening: fewer features, services and protocols means a smaller attack surface.
    • Least privilege: users and processes get only the access they need.
    • Tighter isn't always better — security is balanced against performance and usability.
  9. 9Secure compliance threshold assessed

    Security controls are checked against the standards that apply to you; gaps are remediated and compliance is monitored and reported continuously.

    • Standards depend on industry and region — e.g. HIPAA in healthcare, PCI DSS or SOX in finance.
    • Assessments often surface unknown vulnerabilities — fixable now, before attackers find them.
    • Standards evolve, so compliance is never a one-off.
  10. 10Continuous monitoring

    Applications, systems and networks are watched around the clock for threats, vulnerabilities and anomalies — with incidents handled, documented and reported.

    • ML/AI spots patterns in data volumes no analyst could review.
    • Shifts security from reactive to proactive.
    • Supports HIPAA, PCI DSS and NIST requirements and shows where to invest next.
  11. 11Advanced threat analytics

    Advanced and persistent threats are detected, analyzed and responded to with ML/AI — from data collection to post-incident review.

    • Goes beyond firewalls and antivirus, which sophisticated attackers bypass.
    • Covers insider threats as well as external ones.
    • Needs skilled people, the right tools — and sharing threat intelligence across the industry.

Tell us about your needs.

Schedule a free expert session on delivering secure software, or ask about a team, an audit or the Grow Together program.

Do you need an NDA first?